24 home goals put Real Salt Lake in position to edge NYCFC
What is at stake, with the data behind it
How this story was made
- Evidence
- fixture data, league standings, team statistics, events, and injuries
- Generated
- 9/12/2026, 8:05:23 AM
- Model
- GPT56Luna
- Format checks
- passed · score 100/100 · 471 words
Real Salt Lake’s strong home record meets New York City FC’s balanced away profile, with both teams on 29 points and separated by conference positions.
A home record to test New York City FC’s away numbers
Real Salt Lake welcome New York City FC to America First Field on Sunday with both teams level on 29 points, although they have played a different number of matches. RSL sit 10th in the Western Conference after 23 games, while NYCFC are ninth in the Eastern Conference after 24. The narrow margins make this an important opportunity to improve their position during the regular season.
RSL’s home record gives them a clear statistical advantage. They have won seven of 11 home matches, drawing twice and losing twice. They have scored 24 goals at home, averaging 2.20 per game, while conceding 15. NYCFC’s away record is more balanced: three wins, four draws and four losses. Their 11 away goals average 1.00 per game, and they have conceded 13, with one clean sheet.
Recent form leaves little room for comfort
RSL’s most recent results read loss, win, win, win and draw. That sequence shows a side capable of building momentum, but the latest form also includes a loss, two draws and another loss in the next four matches listed. Their season record of eight wins, five draws and 10 losses reflects that inconsistency, with a goal difference of zero.
NYCFC’s five most recent results are draw, win, win, win and loss. Their longer sequence contains several draws and losses, alongside wins that have kept them close to the playoff positions in the Eastern Conference. With seven wins, eight draws and nine losses, they have also shown a tendency to share points, which could make game management important if the contest remains level.
Formation choices and unavailable players
RSL have used a three-at-the-back structure most often, with both 3-4-3 and 3-4-2-1 appearing nine times. That gives them two leading options for using width and placing pressure on NYCFC’s back four. The visitors have strongly preferred 4-2-3-1, used in 15 matches, with 4-3-3 their next most common choice. The contrast suggests RSL may try to create numerical pressure around the wide areas, while NYCFC can rely on a more familiar four-player defensive shape.
RSL will be without Z. Booth, G. Dillon, J. Glad and A. Piol. E. Eneli, M. Guilavogui, S. Junqua and S. Spierings are questionable. J. Glad’s absence reduces one option within a defensive group already adapting to the team’s three-man preference, while the uncertain availability of Eneli and Spierings could affect midfield selection. NYCFC are missing D. Baiera, A. Farnos, M. Moralez, K. Parks, Talles Magno and K. Trewin. The absences of Moralez and Talles Magno remove two named attacking options, potentially encouraging a more controlled away approach.
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
Season data from the article’s source snapshot; this chart is not a statistic for this match alone.
Prediction
Real Salt Lake 2-1 New York City FC. RSL’s stronger home scoring record should edge a close game, although NYCFC’s away defensive numbers and recent wins point to a competitive contest.
Explore match and season data

Real Salt Lake

New York City FC
Standings source snapshot
These are the saved source standings. They may predate this match; they are not a live or recalculated post-match table.
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | WLWWL | 23 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 52 | 21 | 46 | |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | WDDLW | 24 | 13 | 4 | 7 | 32 | 27 | 43 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles FC | WDDDL | 25 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 40 | 24 | 40 | |
| 4 | FC Dallas | WWDLW | 24 | 11 | 7 | 6 | 47 | 41 | 40 | |
| 5 | San Jose Earthquakes | WDDLL | 24 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 43 | 36 | 38 | |
| 6 | St. Louis City | DWDWD | 24 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 38 | 33 | 38 | |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | DLWLW | 24 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 32 | 32 | 32 | |
| 8 | Portland Timbers | DWLDW | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 46 | 45 | 32 | |
| 9 | San Diego | LLWWL | 24 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 42 | 37 | 30 | |
| 10 | Real Salt Lake | LDLLL | 23 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 37 | 37 | 29 | |
| 11 | Minnesota United FC | LLDWL | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 35 | 39 | 29 | |
| 12 | Los Angeles Galaxy | LWLDW | 25 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 30 | 39 | 29 | |
| 13 | Seattle Sounders | DDDLL | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 24 | 29 | 27 | |
| 14 | Austin | DDWDW | 24 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 30 | 43 | 26 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | LLLDL | 23 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 23 | 58 | 15 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | LDWWW | 24 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 48 | 19 | 53 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | DDWLD | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 59 | 44 | 44 | |
| 3 | New England Revolution | WLWDW | 24 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 39 | 30 | 40 | |
| 4 | Chicago Fire | DDDDW | 23 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 44 | 33 | 39 | |
| 5 | Charlotte | WDWWD | 24 | 11 | 6 | 7 | 42 | 33 | 39 | |
| 6 | Orlando City SC | WWDWL | 24 | 9 | 4 | 11 | 41 | 56 | 31 | |
| 7 | FC Cincinnati | LLDWD | 23 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 49 | 56 | 31 | |
| 8 | Philadelphia Union | WWWDD | 24 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 41 | 39 | 30 | |
| 9 | New York City FC | LDDDL | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 37 | 33 | 29 | |
| 10 | Toronto FC | WDDWD | 24 | 6 | 11 | 7 | 38 | 43 | 29 | |
| 11 | DC United | WDLLD | 23 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 30 | 37 | 28 | |
| 12 | New York Red Bulls | LDLDL | 24 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 32 | 48 | 27 | |
| 13 | Columbus Crew | LWLLL | 24 | 6 | 5 | 13 | 35 | 41 | 23 | |
| 14 | Atlanta United FC | LDLWW | 24 | 6 | 4 | 14 | 29 | 43 | 22 | |
| 15 | CF Montreal | LLLDW | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 31 | 50 | 21 |